Michigan State Prison (or Jackson State Prison) from Detroit Publishing Company Photograph Collection in U.S. Library of Congress
John Abel "Jack" Wight was born on the 1st of March 1889 in the Township of Alabama,
Genesee County, New York, the first son and first child of Noah Wight
and Ida May Ackerson. Noah was an apple farmer and worked 50 acres of
land that he leased from Ida's father.
Jack's life as a
young boy was probably like many other boys in the farming country of
western New York. He would have needed to help his father on the farm
and yet would likely have had ample opportunity to be a boy. There is no
indication in any of the local papers that Jack was a troubled youth.
In
1910, Jack was living at home, but working as a fireman for the
railroad and by 1915, at the age of 26 years, he had left his family
farm in Alabama Townsip and was living in the big city of Buffalo. He
registered there for the draft during WWI, but Buffalo couldn't hold
him. We don't know for sure, maybe it was the sudden death of his
father, or perhaps he could not find the kind of work he wanted there,
or perhaps it was still too close for comfort to the family farm. For
whatever reason, Jack moved on and found a young Scottish immigrant,
named Anna with whom he fell in love. Anna was a couple of years older
than Jack, born about 1887. They were married sometime before 1920 and
moved to Norwalk, Huron County, Ohio where he found employment as a
garage mechanic. For whatever reason children did not come to the young
couple. Still, I imagine that they were mostly happy with no more than the usual problems that arise in a marriage.
But life moves on. Ohio was not the final stop on Jack's road. Sometime in the early 1920's, he and Anna moved to Flint, Genesee County, Michigan.
It was here in Michigan where life began to really take its toll.
First, in 1927, Jack's mother, Ida May, died on the 18th of February. He
traveled back home for the funeral, but his ties to family were now
weakened. Then in October of 1929 the world economy collapsed. Jobs were
so hard to find. Jack was one of the millions out of work. He may have
always had a drinking problem, we don't know, but during this period of
his life, there is little question that he began to drink more, and
drinking did not make him a happy man.
At home, Anna must have tried to hold things together. Somehow they eked by until Jack was given work with the WPA, the government's answer to the rampant unemployment of the Great Depression.
But employment through the WPA, although a godsend for many, was also
hard on a man. He was a second class citizen, a government supported
drone who couldn't make it on his own.
Still, no
matter what the problems, they did not merit the events that followed.
On the 10th of January in 1939, Jack came home drunk. Anna was
understandably upset and would not talk to him. Here he was spending the
few dollars they had on liquor. Jack berated her and undoubtedly placed
much of the blame for their troubles onto her. She still refused to
talk. In his drunken state, probably not realizing exactly what he was
doing, Jack proceeded to pour kerosene over Anna. He then threw a
lighted match into her lap setting her on fire. It appears at this point
that Jack realized what he had done and called for help to put her out.
Anna, however, was severely burned and died one or two days later.
Jack
was arrested and convicted of second-degree murder and then sentenced
in April 1939 for a term of 25 to 40 years in the Southern Michigan
State Prison in Blackman Township, Jackson County, Michigan. “Michigan
State Prison or Jackson State Prison, which opened in 1839, was the
first prison in Michigan. The first permanent structure was constructed
there in 1842. In 1926, the prison was relocated to new building, and
soon became the largest walled prison in the world with nearly 6,000
inmates. The prison was renamed the State Prison of Southern Michigan in
1935.”
Life in prison is tough. But life after
prison can be even tougher. Jack was released from prison in the
mid-1950s and moved to Texas where he found work as a dishwasher at a
cafe. He had been in Texas for only about a year, however, when he died
at his home on 2518 Seevers Street on 26 March 1956 in Dallas of
asphyxiation due to an open burning stove in his apartment; the death
was officially determined to be an accident, but the circumstances
suggest that it was more likely suicide.
I recount this
story here because John Abel Wight is my cousin, my 4th cousin 2 times
removed to be exact. We both descend from the same man, David Dewers (or
Duers), a ship master who lived in Dartmouth, Massachusetts. I hope
that somewhere David is putting his arm around his
great-great-great-great grandson and that, even for Jack, there will be
redemption.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Keeping up with Family Search
Just incredible the number of new data and image collections that are becoming available on Family Search. Here is the list of new things that have appeared in just the last two weeks.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Don't You Just Love Arbitrators
Over the past few years I have enjoyed spending a few hours each week doing INDEXING and ARBITRATION for different Family Search projects. If you have not been involved in this wonderful effort to make records more accessible through digitization and indexing, you really should take the time to get involved. There is one feature of the program, however, that for me has become both a "blessing and a curse," to quote Adrian Monk. This is the ability to review the arbitration of the batches that you have indexed.
Now, I know there are a lot of terrific arbitrators out there who do a great job. They have to make tough decisions as they arbitrate and sometimes the decision does not go my way. I am perfectly fine when this happens, because I am an arbitrator too. I know that at times you just throw a coin in the air and choose heads or tails when it's impossible to decide between two very good possibilities. That's why they pay arbitrators the "big bucks" (ha ha) – they have to make difficult choices sometimes.
What I don't appreciate, however, are the few arbitrators who simply plunge into the job without reading the instructions or without using their brain. To illustrate, let me give you a few examples.
This past summer as we indexed and arbitrated the 1940 US census, one of the common problems was with the three columns labeled at the top with the question "Where did this person live on April 1, 1935?" The indexing instructions were clear on what to do:
"If 'Same house' or 'Same place' or some abbreviation of those terms, such as 'SH' or 'Same H,' was entered in any of the three residence columns for April 1, 1935, then mark this field [columns 18 & 19] as blank, even if a place-name or some other term was recorded in this column."
Those were the instructions, but several arbitrators chose to ignore this. Here is an example where 'same house' was written in column 17 and New York in column 19. The instructions were to mark column 19 as 'blank', which I did. The arbitrator, as you can see below, chose to put 'New York' in the column, however.
Another, probably more important issue, is that some arbitrators do not seem to believe in RECORD MATCHING. One of the first things I learned as an arbitrator was to scan down through both the A and B indexed records to see if they matched up. If one of the arbitrators had missed a line or two so that some of the indexed records were not aligned, then I, as the arbitrator, was supposed to fix the alignment BEFORE I started arbitration.
The worst example of an arbitrator not performing record matching happened to me this summer on one of my indexed batches of the 1855 New York State census. The batches usually came with 90 names (two pages of records). Occasionally, a batch would come up with only 45 names (one page). The form for data entry, however, was still expecting 90 names. When this happened, most indexers would simply fill in the first 45 data lines and leave the last 45 blank. Sometimes, however, an indexer would leave the first 45 blank and fill the data in the last 45 lines. The instructions from Family Search did not specify a particular way to enter these one page images.
This is not a problem for an arbitrator who does record matching. The arbitrator simply lines up the 45 lines from each indexer before beginning to arbitrate. Well, on one of my batches, the arbitrator chose to not do record matching. Therefore, when he/she did the arbitration, he/she arbitrated filled data lines from my batch with blank lines from the other indexer and then blank lines from my batch with filled data lines from the other indexer, ignoring the fact that all the data was there from both indexers. It just wasn't lined up properly. My arbitration score on the batch was, as you can imagine, not very good – less than 20%. I got credit for the header data that was about it.
I have more to say on these issues, and will continue this on additional blog entries. Hope you'll come back for more.
Now, I know there are a lot of terrific arbitrators out there who do a great job. They have to make tough decisions as they arbitrate and sometimes the decision does not go my way. I am perfectly fine when this happens, because I am an arbitrator too. I know that at times you just throw a coin in the air and choose heads or tails when it's impossible to decide between two very good possibilities. That's why they pay arbitrators the "big bucks" (ha ha) – they have to make difficult choices sometimes.
What I don't appreciate, however, are the few arbitrators who simply plunge into the job without reading the instructions or without using their brain. To illustrate, let me give you a few examples.
This past summer as we indexed and arbitrated the 1940 US census, one of the common problems was with the three columns labeled at the top with the question "Where did this person live on April 1, 1935?" The indexing instructions were clear on what to do:
"If 'Same house' or 'Same place' or some abbreviation of those terms, such as 'SH' or 'Same H,' was entered in any of the three residence columns for April 1, 1935, then mark this field [columns 18 & 19] as blank, even if a place-name or some other term was recorded in this column."
Those were the instructions, but several arbitrators chose to ignore this. Here is an example where 'same house' was written in column 17 and New York in column 19. The instructions were to mark column 19 as 'blank', which I did. The arbitrator, as you can see below, chose to put 'New York' in the column, however.
Another, probably more important issue, is that some arbitrators do not seem to believe in RECORD MATCHING. One of the first things I learned as an arbitrator was to scan down through both the A and B indexed records to see if they matched up. If one of the arbitrators had missed a line or two so that some of the indexed records were not aligned, then I, as the arbitrator, was supposed to fix the alignment BEFORE I started arbitration.
The worst example of an arbitrator not performing record matching happened to me this summer on one of my indexed batches of the 1855 New York State census. The batches usually came with 90 names (two pages of records). Occasionally, a batch would come up with only 45 names (one page). The form for data entry, however, was still expecting 90 names. When this happened, most indexers would simply fill in the first 45 data lines and leave the last 45 blank. Sometimes, however, an indexer would leave the first 45 blank and fill the data in the last 45 lines. The instructions from Family Search did not specify a particular way to enter these one page images.
This is not a problem for an arbitrator who does record matching. The arbitrator simply lines up the 45 lines from each indexer before beginning to arbitrate. Well, on one of my batches, the arbitrator chose to not do record matching. Therefore, when he/she did the arbitration, he/she arbitrated filled data lines from my batch with blank lines from the other indexer and then blank lines from my batch with filled data lines from the other indexer, ignoring the fact that all the data was there from both indexers. It just wasn't lined up properly. My arbitration score on the batch was, as you can imagine, not very good – less than 20%. I got credit for the header data that was about it.
I have more to say on these issues, and will continue this on additional blog entries. Hope you'll come back for more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)